So, I am really eager to talk about the end of the novel, and have been planning on talking about the end on Thursday, but if another class or two means more people will be finished and it improves our discussion, I would be in favor of delaying our conversation and talking about something else on Thursday, maybe even a kind of midterm workshop (share ideas in groups and do some kind of activity). What do people think?
A Supposedly Fun Boo… on When Infinite Jest Is Just TOO… Bradley J. Fest on Defining Game and Defining Pla… Steph Roman on Defining Game and Defining Pla… epiratequeen on Lisa Jevbratt’s “1… epiratequeen on 88 Constellations for Wittgens…
TagsAA members Addiction alcohol Alcoholics Anonymous andrew hoberek annular eclipse annulation apres garde avant garde Avril Incandenza Being and Time Calamity Song cliche mentality Close Reading communication cruft data processing David Foster Wallace David Letzler denial dialogue digital age dullness E-Literature Electronic Literature Electronic Poetry encylopedic novels endnotes ENGLIT 1001 Ennet House Eschaton footnotes Hal Incandenza Hammer Handiness hole punch Huffington Post illustrations Infinite Jest Infinite Test Interactive Literature I swear it's not blasphemy I swear what he's saying is awesome Johann Hari language Mario Incandenza Martin Heidegger maximalism maximialism Michael Pemulis minimalism Object pointlessness Presence-at-hand Ready-at-hand Ready-to-hand recovery Required Posts rings section headings should I expect flame wars? Spring 2015 systems novels tattoos The Decemberists Tiny Ewell Tool Twitter unborable attention University of Pittsburgh Vorhandenheit weird circle what else do we call this thing yes yes you don't follow what I mean here good! Zuhandenheit